header-logo header-logo

Reform at CILEX

16 January 2024
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
CILEX has reported majority member support for its planned reforms to regulation and professional titles

More than 1,200 members responded to the Enhancing consumer trust and confidence consultation, which closed in November, with 67% supporting a new suite of specialist titles to show parity of practice rights with solicitors.

It found 60% supported shifting regulator so CILEX members came under the remit of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

However, CILEX is seeking clarification and assurances from the SRA on the cost of regulation and the principle of no cross-subsidy, in light of the collapse of Axiom Ince and £66m of missing client money. Linda Ford, CILEX CEO, said the reforms ‘have the potential to drive positive change for both consumers and providers’. 

Issue: 8055 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll