header-logo header-logo

Reforming criminal appeals: déjà vu?

11 April 2025 / Martin Rackstraw
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail
215642
Can the Law Commission’s consultation finally deliver radical reforms 30 years in the making? Martin Rackstraw weighs up the issues at hand

Criminal defence practitioners—and indeed anyone who is concerned about preventing miscarriages of justice—will welcome the Law Commission’s recently published consultation paper on appeals in criminal proceedings.

National outrage at the wrongful convictions of many innocent sub-postmasters due to the Horizon scandal, and the appalling case of Andrew Malkinson, gives the Law Commission’s project added urgency. However, in truth, discontent with the current appellate system has been widespread for years.

Lessons from past reforms

One of the most frustrating aspects of all this is the very real sense that we have been here before. As far back as 1991, following public concern over the wrongful conviction and imprisonment of the Guildford Four, the Birmingham Six and others, the then government set up a Royal Commission to carry out a thorough review of the criminal justice system. A key recommendation of that commission was the creation of an independent body

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll