header-logo header-logo

Reforming criminal appeals: déjà vu?

11 April 2025 / Martin Rackstraw
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail
215642
Can the Law Commission’s consultation finally deliver radical reforms 30 years in the making? Martin Rackstraw weighs up the issues at hand

Criminal defence practitioners—and indeed anyone who is concerned about preventing miscarriages of justice—will welcome the Law Commission’s recently published consultation paper on appeals in criminal proceedings.

National outrage at the wrongful convictions of many innocent sub-postmasters due to the Horizon scandal, and the appalling case of Andrew Malkinson, gives the Law Commission’s project added urgency. However, in truth, discontent with the current appellate system has been widespread for years.

Lessons from past reforms

One of the most frustrating aspects of all this is the very real sense that we have been here before. As far back as 1991, following public concern over the wrongful conviction and imprisonment of the Guildford Four, the Birmingham Six and others, the then government set up a Royal Commission to carry out a thorough review of the criminal justice system. A key recommendation of that commission was the creation of an independent body

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll