header-logo header-logo

Reforming criminal appeals: déjà vu?

11 April 2025 / Martin Rackstraw
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail
215642
Can the Law Commission’s consultation finally deliver radical reforms 30 years in the making? Martin Rackstraw weighs up the issues at hand

Criminal defence practitioners—and indeed anyone who is concerned about preventing miscarriages of justice—will welcome the Law Commission’s recently published consultation paper on appeals in criminal proceedings.

National outrage at the wrongful convictions of many innocent sub-postmasters due to the Horizon scandal, and the appalling case of Andrew Malkinson, gives the Law Commission’s project added urgency. However, in truth, discontent with the current appellate system has been widespread for years.

Lessons from past reforms

One of the most frustrating aspects of all this is the very real sense that we have been here before. As far back as 1991, following public concern over the wrongful conviction and imprisonment of the Guildford Four, the Birmingham Six and others, the then government set up a Royal Commission to carry out a thorough review of the criminal justice system. A key recommendation of that commission was the creation of an independent body

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll