header-logo header-logo

29 December 2020
Categories: Legal News , Commercial , Technology
printer mail-detail

Reforming smart contracts

The Law Commission has issued a call for lawyers’ views on smart contracts while it considers reform

Smart contracts are growing in popularity and widely believed to increase efficiency and certainty in business. However, the Commission says there are questions about the circumstances in which they become legally binding, how they are interpreted, what mistakes might occur and the remedies available.

A smart contract is a legally binding contract in which some or all of the contractual obligations are recorded in or performed automatically by a computer program deployed on a distributed ledger.

Professor Sarah Green, Law Commissioner for commercial and common law, said: ‘Smart contracts promise to revolutionise the way we do business.

‘However, there are lingering uncertainties about how English contract law applies to smart contracts. We believe there is a compelling case for reviewing the law in this area to ensure that the jurisdiction of England and Wales remains a competitive choice for businesses using this emerging technology.’

In particular, the Commission is seeking views on the definition of smart contracts, how they may be used, their potential benefits and associated costs, formation, interpretation, remedies, consumer protection and jurisdiction issues.

Views are invited up to 31 March 2021, and the Commission aims to publish its scoping study in late 2021. Find out more at: www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/smart-contracts.

Categories: Legal News , Commercial , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll