header-logo header-logo

Reforms for deforestation-free supply chains

12 December 2022
Issue: 8007 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Environment , Climate change litigation , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
Lawyers are advising businesses to start preparing for regulatory reforms on deforestation-free supply chains.

Last week, the European Parliament and the EU Council of the EU reached a provisional agreement on a regulation on deforestation-free supply chains. Under its terms, companies must issue due diligence statements that source materials were produced on land not subject to deforestation since 31 December 2020 and comply with legislation relating to human rights, including the rights of indigenous people. The source materials affected include palm oil, cattle, soy, coffee, timber and rubber, as well as derived products such as chocolate, beef, leather and furniture.

Companies will not be able to sell products within the EU without this statement. Penalties for non-compliance will be a maximum of 4% of the total annual turnover in each member state.

Companies will also be required to collect precise geographical information on the farmland where the commodities that they source have been grown, so that they can be checked for compliance.

The European Commission will run a benchmarking system that will assess countries or areas and their level of risk. Obligations for companies will depend on the level of risk.

The regulation must now be formally adopted before it can come into force, after which operators and traders will be given 18 months to adjust. Micro and small traders will be given a longer adaptation period.

Solicitors at Osborne Clarke commented in an update that ‘even though this regulation will not come into force for at least 18 months, businesses should consider the source of their products now, and think through the systems that will need to be put in place to produce or obtain the due diligence statement.

‘In the UK, the Environment Act 2021 will place a similar duty on businesses to have a due diligence system in place and to report annually on forest-risk commodities’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll