header-logo header-logo

12 December 2022
Issue: 8007 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Environment , Climate change litigation , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Reforms for deforestation-free supply chains

Lawyers are advising businesses to start preparing for regulatory reforms on deforestation-free supply chains.

Last week, the European Parliament and the EU Council of the EU reached a provisional agreement on a regulation on deforestation-free supply chains. Under its terms, companies must issue due diligence statements that source materials were produced on land not subject to deforestation since 31 December 2020 and comply with legislation relating to human rights, including the rights of indigenous people. The source materials affected include palm oil, cattle, soy, coffee, timber and rubber, as well as derived products such as chocolate, beef, leather and furniture.

Companies will not be able to sell products within the EU without this statement. Penalties for non-compliance will be a maximum of 4% of the total annual turnover in each member state.

Companies will also be required to collect precise geographical information on the farmland where the commodities that they source have been grown, so that they can be checked for compliance.

The European Commission will run a benchmarking system that will assess countries or areas and their level of risk. Obligations for companies will depend on the level of risk.

The regulation must now be formally adopted before it can come into force, after which operators and traders will be given 18 months to adjust. Micro and small traders will be given a longer adaptation period.

Solicitors at Osborne Clarke commented in an update that ‘even though this regulation will not come into force for at least 18 months, businesses should consider the source of their products now, and think through the systems that will need to be put in place to produce or obtain the due diligence statement.

‘In the UK, the Environment Act 2021 will place a similar duty on businesses to have a due diligence system in place and to report annually on forest-risk commodities’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll