header-logo header-logo

20 February 2013
Issue: 7549 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Stamp of authority for will-writers

But estate administration excluded from statutory regulation

Moves to make will-writing a reserved activity do not go far enough to protect the public from fraud and incompetence, say will-writers.

Consumers often suffer problems such as high pressure sales tactics and poorly drafted wills, and problems usually only come to light after someone has died. By then, it is very difficult to put matters right.

The Legal Services Board (LSB) recommended to the Lord Chancellor last week that will-writing should become a reserved (or regulated) activity. However, the recommendation does not extend to estate administration.

The Society of Will Writers said it was “disappointed” as it had “long identified and reported the fact that many of the cases identified as poor wills was due more to poor or fraudulent estate administration than to the actual quality of the will”. It called on the LSB to “look again” at estate administration.

The Institute of Professional Willwriters (IPW), which has campaigned for more than 20 years for will-writing to be regulated, launched a voluntary code of practice for will-writers in 2010, but only a minority of practitioners joined the scheme.

It warned in a statement that omitting estate administration, which involved handling a deceased person’s money and assets, posed a “huge risk” to consumers since sums often amounting to hundreds of thousands of pounds were “susceptible to loss due to fraud or theft” during the process.

Alan Kershaw, chair of ILEX professional standards, says: “It is likely that public and consumer protection will be compromised if the result is that less competent and professional providers shift to estate administration—the part of the process which is most profitable, and where the need for client protection measures is greatest.” 

In its announcement, the LSB said it had “considered carefully the reported risk of fraud in estate administration” but concluded that “statutory regulation would not be effective in preventing what amounts to criminal behaviour”.

Writing for this week’s NLJ, Paul Sharpe, the Chairman of IPW says: “I know many, many
will-writing professionals who are desperate for the services that they provide to become regulated. Not only will that see off the cowboys and the incompetent but it will enable them to stand out in the market with the credibility that they deserve.”

Issue: 7549 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten strengthens financial markets and funds group in London

Hugh James—Keith Cundall & Lee Hart

Hugh James—Keith Cundall & Lee Hart

Hugh James expands national Serious Injury team with two new Partners

HFW—Rémi Ducloyer

HFW—Rémi Ducloyer

HFW continues Paris office growth with public law Partner hire

NEWS
The Court of Appeal's decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP has lifted months of uncertainty for Chartered Legal Executives while prompting a rethink of regulation and supervision
The assisted dying debate returns to Westminster as Lauren Edwards MP reintroduces legislation that stalled in the House of Lords last session despite clearing the Commons
A little-noticed provision of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 has fundamentally expanded corporate criminal liability
Artificial intelligence is transforming legal practice, but careless reliance on it is creating growing professional risks
The law offers cohabiting couples surprisingly greater protection after one partner dies than when they separate during life
back-to-top-scroll