header-logo header-logo

20 February 2013
Issue: 7549 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Stamp of authority for will-writers

But estate administration excluded from statutory regulation

Moves to make will-writing a reserved activity do not go far enough to protect the public from fraud and incompetence, say will-writers.

Consumers often suffer problems such as high pressure sales tactics and poorly drafted wills, and problems usually only come to light after someone has died. By then, it is very difficult to put matters right.

The Legal Services Board (LSB) recommended to the Lord Chancellor last week that will-writing should become a reserved (or regulated) activity. However, the recommendation does not extend to estate administration.

The Society of Will Writers said it was “disappointed” as it had “long identified and reported the fact that many of the cases identified as poor wills was due more to poor or fraudulent estate administration than to the actual quality of the will”. It called on the LSB to “look again” at estate administration.

The Institute of Professional Willwriters (IPW), which has campaigned for more than 20 years for will-writing to be regulated, launched a voluntary code of practice for will-writers in 2010, but only a minority of practitioners joined the scheme.

It warned in a statement that omitting estate administration, which involved handling a deceased person’s money and assets, posed a “huge risk” to consumers since sums often amounting to hundreds of thousands of pounds were “susceptible to loss due to fraud or theft” during the process.

Alan Kershaw, chair of ILEX professional standards, says: “It is likely that public and consumer protection will be compromised if the result is that less competent and professional providers shift to estate administration—the part of the process which is most profitable, and where the need for client protection measures is greatest.” 

In its announcement, the LSB said it had “considered carefully the reported risk of fraud in estate administration” but concluded that “statutory regulation would not be effective in preventing what amounts to criminal behaviour”.

Writing for this week’s NLJ, Paul Sharpe, the Chairman of IPW says: “I know many, many
will-writing professionals who are desperate for the services that they provide to become regulated. Not only will that see off the cowboys and the incompetent but it will enable them to stand out in the market with the credibility that they deserve.”

Issue: 7549 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll