header-logo header-logo

Regulator warning on boycott

28 July 2015
Issue: 7663 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has issued a warning to solicitors planning action over criminal legal aid changes that they must fully consider “the circumstances of each individual client” and ensure they meet required standards.

The warning follows a change in tactic by solicitors’ groups, who will now accept magistrates’ and police station work but boycott the Crown court.

The SRA says that where a client requires advocacy in court, “it is in the best interests of the client for the firm to use its best endeavours to secure advocacy for the client. 

“This may include the use of appropriately qualified advocates employed by the firm as well as external advocates. It is the client’s best interests that are paramount once instructions have been accepted.”

Criminal legal aid solicitors have been boycotting new work since 1 July, when a fees cut of 8.75% was imposed. Members of the Criminal Bar have supported the action by declining new work and refusing “returns” from the courts.

In a joint statement last week, Criminal Law Solicitors Association (CLSA) chair Bill Waddington and London Criminal Court Solicitors Association (LCCSA) chair Jon Black said they had struggled to keep the action going because “the Big Firms” were ready to pull out.

Therefore, they had persuaded these firms to remain involved on the basis of no representation in the Crown Court.

“There is currently a critical mass of unrepresented defendants in the Crown Court and the continuation of the protocol would continue where it is most visible,” they said. 

 

Issue: 7663 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll