header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008 / George Davies , Richard Burger , Peter Steel
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Features , Public , Regulatory , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Regulatory Column

The Practitioner

What a Mess!

The late, great Frank Muir used to write about the antics of a rather scruffy Afghan Hound. All those who came across the unfortunate mutt would exclaim: “What a mess!” Unsurprisingly, the poor animal came to believe that this was in fact his real name. One would not be surprised to find that those whose task it is to contain the perennial problem of insider dealing and market abuse in the UK might have a similar reaction when they try and implement the latest initiatives from HM Treasury and the Financial Services Authority (FSA) in this area.

HM Treasury recently produced a “consultation paper” dated 7 February 2008. It's always hard not to think of the words “kick” “long” and “grass” when one sees the word “consultation” in this context but perhaps genuine input from market users is what HM Treasury wants (or needs) this time round.

Defining Market Abuse

Since the adoption of the Market Abuse Directive (MAD) in July 2005, s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll