header-logo header-logo

13 March 2008 / John Clinch
Issue: 7312 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Wills & Probate , Other practice areas
printer mail-detail

Relative success

John Clinch offers a cautious welcome to the increasing number of online resources for probate research

The reputation of that information superhighway, the internet, makes it tempting to believe that finding missing heirs or completing a family tree is as simple as clicking a mouse. Tempting, but misleading. Specialist expertise, practical experience—and, not least, the researcher’s personal touch—are still essential to reach a successful conclusion: the reliable answers that solicitors and their clients demand. To the experienced genealogist the internet, like a book or archive, is just another tool. Each is useful for tackling part of the job, but none delivers the complete solution. To understand from the record of a life event—birth, marriage, emigration or death—how close research has brought you to the right person, experience is essential. No computer program can replicate that. Online, the immediate future is likely to prove especially difficult. The birth, marriage and death records that have been centrally recorded since 1837 represent the basic resource of genealogical research in and . Unfortunately, despite the failure

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll