header-logo header-logo

05 November 2009 / Timothy Dutton KC
Issue: 7392 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Remodelling the Bar

Timothy Dutton QC considers the impact of the Legal Services Act on the independent Bar

Barristers tend to predict the demise of the independent or “Referral Bar” with monotonous regularity, only to be proved wrong at each turn.In the early 1990s the prediction was made with real anguish as the leaders of the profession saw exclusive rights of audience removed in the higher courts, where barristers had for centuries enjoyed a monopoly.

Demise came there none: the Bar responded by improving its standards of training, maintaining high standards of regulation with comparatively low levels of complaint and a good complaints record, with occasional praise coming from the Legal Services Ombudsman. 

What then will be the effect of the Legal Services Act 2007?  True to form there are those who predict Armageddon. But there are others who welcome the opportunities which the Act is said to provide. There are two issues which face the Bar:

How its regulator the Bar Standards Board (BSB) should respond to the Act. Should it permit partnerships of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll