header-logo header-logo

Removal case highlights legal aid reform dangers

07 February 2008
Issue: 7307 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Family Law

The recent illegal removal of a child from the care of its mother by Nottingham Social Services highlights the need for families to have access to specialist legal representation in such situations, the Association of Lawyers for Children (ALC) says.

However, ALC co-chairman Alistair MacDonald says current government policy is making it increasingly difficult for parents to find specialist family lawyers locally to represent them when social services seek to remove their children.

He says: “The government’s legal aid reforms mean the number of family lawyers available to represent the most disadvantaged families is in decline.”

A recent ALC survey shows the reforms are forcing nearly a fifth of respondents to leave the profession, of which more than half were the most experienced legal practitioners, and that 40% were intending to reduce or had reduced the amount of legal aid work they do for parents and children. MacDonald says: “What would have happened in this case if the mother had not been able to find a family lawyer to take the case before a judge so that the right decision could be made? As we have repeatedly said, a legal aid scheme that reduces the number of specialist family lawyers able to represent children and families is bad for children, bad for society and bad for the country as a whole.” He says the judge’s decision in this case shows the family justice system works effectively to promote and safeguard the welfare of vulnerable children.

Issue: 7307 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Child law , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll