header-logo header-logo

23 September 2010 / Malcolm Dowden , Simon Ewing
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Features , Public , Environment
printer mail-detail

Renewable conflicts

Malcolm Dowden & Simon Ewing discuss issues affecting the coalition government’s energy objectives

The Coalition government published its first Annual Energy Statement in July 2010. It observes that the rationale for action is economic as well as environmental.

With its own oil and gas resources declining, failure to act now would make the UK more vulnerable to high, and volatile, oil and gas prices. It confirmed the government’s mission “to support the transition to a secure, safe, low-carbon, affordable energy system in the UK, and to mobilise commitment to ambitious action on climate change internationally”.

The statement sets out 32 actions intended to promote those objectives. They range from measures designed to remove barriers to investment in energy efficiency, to the promotion of a range of renewable energy technologies and an increase in the EU’s greenhouse gas reduction target from 20%–30%.

It is, necessarily, a complex area. Increasingly, responses to government consultations are highlighting the scope for conflict between policies and objectives, and the risk of challenge or litigation should policies be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll