header-logo header-logo

Report questions quality of magistrates’ decision-making

15 November 2023
Issue: 8049 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-detail
Poor decision-making in the magistrates’ courts is causing people to be remanded in custody unnecessarily, a report by JUSTICE suggests

The report, ‘Remand decision-making in the magistrates’ courtRemand decision-making in the magistrates’ court’, published last week, said the number of people on remand in custody awaiting trial, rather than released on bail, has risen in recent years. In September 2022, it was at its highest in 50 years.

In March 2023, the remand population stood at 14,591, a 14% increase from last year, and a 45% increase from March 2020.

This increase places strain on existing resources, such as cell capacity and educational provision, as well as putting prisoners on remand at risk of losing employment, accommodation and ties with support systems. Moreover, individuals from Black and racialised backgrounds are disproportionately impacted.

However, JUSTICE’s research using data from 742 hearings uncovered that the processes for determining bail do not appear to be properly followed in the magistrates’ courts. JUSTICE found that decision makers rarely provided reasons for their decisions, despite legislative requirements to do so. There were disparities in outcomes, particularly for non-White defendants, foreign national defendants, defendants appearing via video-link and in a secure dock, and defendants lacking representation.

The report noted that ‘such disparities suggest biased decision-making driven by perceptions of risk, likely exacerbated by a lack of diversity amongst decision makers’. However, the lack of data available means further research will be required to establish the extent of this issue. JUSTICE has called on the government to undertake further research.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘It is extremely concerning that the JUSTICE report suggests that the law is not being properly applied.

‘The research demonstrates the importance of defendants being represented from the very start of their case and ensuring they have full knowledge of the potentially life-changing decisions that are taking place.’

Issue: 8049 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll