header-logo header-logo

Report questions quality of magistrates’ decision-making

15 November 2023
Issue: 8049 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-detail
Poor decision-making in the magistrates’ courts is causing people to be remanded in custody unnecessarily, a report by JUSTICE suggests

The report, ‘Remand decision-making in the magistrates’ courtRemand decision-making in the magistrates’ court’, published last week, said the number of people on remand in custody awaiting trial, rather than released on bail, has risen in recent years. In September 2022, it was at its highest in 50 years.

In March 2023, the remand population stood at 14,591, a 14% increase from last year, and a 45% increase from March 2020.

This increase places strain on existing resources, such as cell capacity and educational provision, as well as putting prisoners on remand at risk of losing employment, accommodation and ties with support systems. Moreover, individuals from Black and racialised backgrounds are disproportionately impacted.

However, JUSTICE’s research using data from 742 hearings uncovered that the processes for determining bail do not appear to be properly followed in the magistrates’ courts. JUSTICE found that decision makers rarely provided reasons for their decisions, despite legislative requirements to do so. There were disparities in outcomes, particularly for non-White defendants, foreign national defendants, defendants appearing via video-link and in a secure dock, and defendants lacking representation.

The report noted that ‘such disparities suggest biased decision-making driven by perceptions of risk, likely exacerbated by a lack of diversity amongst decision makers’. However, the lack of data available means further research will be required to establish the extent of this issue. JUSTICE has called on the government to undertake further research.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘It is extremely concerning that the JUSTICE report suggests that the law is not being properly applied.

‘The research demonstrates the importance of defendants being represented from the very start of their case and ensuring they have full knowledge of the potentially life-changing decisions that are taking place.’

Issue: 8049 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll