header-logo header-logo

05 January 2021
Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Research finds women’s income likely to fall by almost twice men’s post-divorce

The financial services company Legal & General has found that women are likely to have their household incomes fall by a third (33%), almost twice the decrease likely to be faced by men (18%)

LNB News: The research suggests that this could be driven by a combination of several key factors, including that women are typically paid less than their male counterparts, with the average divorcing man four times as likely to be earning more than the woman in the relationship (74% versus 18%). Further, and significantly, women are more likely to waive their rights to a partner’s pension during a divorce (28% women versus 19%) despite data showing that men currently below the State Pension age have a higher median active pension wealth (£25,300 men versus £20,000 women), and that a man’s median pension wealth for those aged over 65 is double a woman’s (£223,933 men versus £112,967 women).

Other key statistics arising from the research are:

• women are more likely to face financial struggle post-divorce (31% women versus 21% men)

• women are more likely to worry about the impact on their retirement (16% women versus 10% men)

• more men felt that the division of finances at the point of divorce was fair and equitable (54% men versus 49% women)

This content was first published by Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 4 January 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.com

Source: The Divorce Gap – women see incomes fall by 33% following divorce, compared to just 18% for men

Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll