header-logo header-logo

Resolution condemns "travesty" in family justice system

16 July 2015
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Family lawyers’ group Resolution has slated the Justice Secretary’s “bullish and unapologetic” response to a critical Justice Committee report on the legal aid cuts.

Justice Secretary Michael Gove said he did not accept the Justice Committee’s findings that the Ministry had “largely failed to achieve [its] wider objectives for reform beyond achieving savings”, in his response to the Committee’s report into the impact of the changes to civil legal aid under Part 1 of LASPO (Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act), published this week.

Instead, “unnecessary and adversarial litigation at public expense [had] been reduced”, he said, while funding had been targeted at those most in need. The reforms had been “expressly designed to make sure that we meet our legal commitments”, he said, and the exceptional case funding scheme made sure funding would continue to be made available “where its absence would breach or would risk breaching” European Convention rights or EU law.

However, Resolution chairman Jo Edwards hit back: “While there have been some welcome concessions recently, such as widening the domestic violence evidence requirements, much more needs to be done, quickly, to protect access to justice for the vulnerable.

“We strongly advocate, at the very least, that the government take heed of the committee’s recommendation that legislation be drafted to protect vulnerable people from being cross-examined by the person who abused them, which is tantamount to a perpetuation of the abuse.

“That this situation, long legislated against in the criminal courts, should continue to exist in our family justice system is a travesty.”

Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll