header-logo header-logo

16 July 2015
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Resolution condemns "travesty" in family justice system

Family lawyers’ group Resolution has slated the Justice Secretary’s “bullish and unapologetic” response to a critical Justice Committee report on the legal aid cuts.

Justice Secretary Michael Gove said he did not accept the Justice Committee’s findings that the Ministry had “largely failed to achieve [its] wider objectives for reform beyond achieving savings”, in his response to the Committee’s report into the impact of the changes to civil legal aid under Part 1 of LASPO (Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act), published this week.

Instead, “unnecessary and adversarial litigation at public expense [had] been reduced”, he said, while funding had been targeted at those most in need. The reforms had been “expressly designed to make sure that we meet our legal commitments”, he said, and the exceptional case funding scheme made sure funding would continue to be made available “where its absence would breach or would risk breaching” European Convention rights or EU law.

However, Resolution chairman Jo Edwards hit back: “While there have been some welcome concessions recently, such as widening the domestic violence evidence requirements, much more needs to be done, quickly, to protect access to justice for the vulnerable.

“We strongly advocate, at the very least, that the government take heed of the committee’s recommendation that legislation be drafted to protect vulnerable people from being cross-examined by the person who abused them, which is tantamount to a perpetuation of the abuse.

“That this situation, long legislated against in the criminal courts, should continue to exist in our family justice system is a travesty.”

Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll