header-logo header-logo

26 June 2026 / Ann Stanyer
Issue: 8167 / Categories: Features , Court of Protection , Family
printer mail-detail

Resolving contact issues in the Court of Protection

253193
© Getty images
Ann Stanyer considers whether the law offers sufficient protection for family contact in care settings
  • The Court of Protection continues to grapple with disputes over family contact, with recent case law highlighting the tension between residents’ rights, care providers’ responsibilities and the practical limits of the court’s jurisdiction.
  • As the government considers reforms to visiting rights in health and care settings, practitioners should be alert to the protections afforded by reg 9A and their impact on contact restrictions.

A review of judgments reported in the Court of Protection since January 2025 indicates that some 25% of those cases involved issues surrounding contact with a protected party. This issue has been brought into sharp focus by the case of SB v PB (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) v Bolton Borough Council [2026] EWCOP 21, as well as by the Department of Health and Social Care’s (DHSC’s) press release, in March, indicating government action following a review of the visiting rights for people in health

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll