header-logo header-logo

26 June 2026 / Ann Stanyer
Issue: 8167 / Categories: Features , Court of Protection , Family
printer mail-detail

Resolving contact issues in the Court of Protection

253193
© Getty images
Ann Stanyer considers whether the law offers sufficient protection for family contact in care settings
  • The Court of Protection continues to grapple with disputes over family contact, with recent case law highlighting the tension between residents’ rights, care providers’ responsibilities and the practical limits of the court’s jurisdiction.
  • As the government considers reforms to visiting rights in health and care settings, practitioners should be alert to the protections afforded by reg 9A and their impact on contact restrictions.

A review of judgments reported in the Court of Protection since January 2025 indicates that some 25% of those cases involved issues surrounding contact with a protected party. This issue has been brought into sharp focus by the case of SB v PB (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) v Bolton Borough Council [2026] EWCOP 21, as well as by the Department of Health and Social Care’s (DHSC’s) press release, in March, indicating government action following a review of the visiting rights for people in health

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll