header-logo header-logo

22 October 2009 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Restrictive covenants

Malcolm Dowden unravels the complexities of enforcing restrictive covenants in building schemes

Building schemes arise where land has been developed by being laid out in plots and then sold to different buyers. Each buyer enters into restrictive covenants with the common seller restricting the use of the particular plot for the benefit of the estate generally.

Their purpose is to preserve the value of the estate and to prevent, for instance, business use in a residential area. The owner for the time being of each plot is bound by the scheme and he can enforce its rules against all other owners governed by the scheme. Restrictive covenants contained within the scheme are also enforceable by owners of sub-divisions of land within the scheme (Brunner v Greenslade [1970] 3 All ER 833).

A building scheme requires: an intention to impose mutually enforceable restrictions in the interest of all the buyers and their successors; and a clearly defined area affected by the scheme, and known to the buyers.

A building scheme constitutes a local law, binding the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll