header-logo header-logo

22 October 2009 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Restrictive covenants

Malcolm Dowden unravels the complexities of enforcing restrictive covenants in building schemes

Building schemes arise where land has been developed by being laid out in plots and then sold to different buyers. Each buyer enters into restrictive covenants with the common seller restricting the use of the particular plot for the benefit of the estate generally.

Their purpose is to preserve the value of the estate and to prevent, for instance, business use in a residential area. The owner for the time being of each plot is bound by the scheme and he can enforce its rules against all other owners governed by the scheme. Restrictive covenants contained within the scheme are also enforceable by owners of sub-divisions of land within the scheme (Brunner v Greenslade [1970] 3 All ER 833).

A building scheme requires: an intention to impose mutually enforceable restrictions in the interest of all the buyers and their successors; and a clearly defined area affected by the scheme, and known to the buyers.

A building scheme constitutes a local law, binding the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll