header-logo header-logo

Retained EU Bill plea from the Law Society

18 January 2023
Categories: Legal News , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail
The Law Society issued a plea for an extension and clarity on what’s at stake this week as the controversial Retained EU Law Bill entered its final stage in the House of Commons.

It urged the government to publish an exhaustive list of every piece of legislation being revoked under the sunset clause to ensure adequate scrutiny of what might be lost. 

Under the bill, all EU-derived laws would be repealed at the close of this year unless specifically protected by the government. At stake are thousands of laws on food safety, building safety and fire prevention regulations, consumer protection, health and safety, holiday pay, maternity provision, environmental law and a wide variety of other assorted provisions. Critics of the bill have warned it would leave businesses in chaos.

The Law Society called on the government to extend the time line for reform and remove the 31 December 2023 deadline for reviewing retained law.

Spelling out the Law Society’s concerns, president Lubna Shuja said: ‘As it stands the bill would entail bypassing parliamentary scrutiny and stakeholder consultation by giving Ministers the power to independently revoke, restate, replace or update retained EU law.

‘If enacted as is, the bill could lead to different interpretations of the law by different courts and to the nations of the UK enforcing different regulations. This would not only unbalance the devolution settlements, it could also lead to legal confusion for businesses and consumers for decades to come.

‘Clause 7 takes the highly unusual step of giving powers to the Law Officers—the Attorney General, the Solicitor General and the Advocate General—to interfere in civil litigation after a case has concluded.

'This is contrary to the interests of justice and the rule of law.

‘Our members—solicitors—are particularly concerned workers could lose access to long-established rights that now form an integral part of Britain’s reputation as a fair society, such as holiday pay or protection against fire and rehire.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

North East firm welcomes employment specialist

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Partner joins commercial and technology practice

Ellisons—Lizzy Firmin

Ellisons—Lizzy Firmin

Chief operating officer joins equity partnership

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
back-to-top-scroll