header-logo header-logo

18 November 2022 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 8003 / Categories: Features , EU , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Retained EU law: no quick fixes?

100882
Domesticating retained EU law: practical necessity or ideological project? Charles Pigott considers the mammoth task ahead
  • One key aim of the EU Retained Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill is to excise the supremacy of EU law from our EU derived law from 2024 onwards.
  • The complexity of the Bill is testament to how difficult that task is going to be.

In what proved to be a cruel month for the short-lived Truss administration, the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill was introduced by Jacob Rees-Mogg on 22 September, one day before the ill-fated mini budget was delivered by Kwasi Kwarteng. Rees-Mogg resigned from the cabinet upon the appointment of Rishi Sunak as prime minister, but the Bill went on to receive its second reading in the House of Commons on 25 October.

Whatever its final form, the Bill as introduced to the House of Commons provides a vivid illustration of how entwined our domestic law continues to be with Europe, and the size of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll