header-logo header-logo

Retaliatory evictions must be stopped, says CAB

14 June 2007
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Legal News , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Nearly a million private tenants fear eviction if they complain about the poor standards of their homes, Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) research shows.

In a practice known as “retaliatory eviction”, rogue landlords serve notice on them to quit in response to requests for repairs or complaints, using s 21 of the Housing Act 1988 to end assured shorthold tenancy agreements. The CAB report, The Tenant’s Dilemma, highlights the choice faced by many tenants—whether to risk eviction or continue living in damp or unsuitable housing. Its author, Debbie Crew, a CAB worker from Merseyside, says: “We want a change in the law to stop this practice by putting restrictions on the use of section 21 where a tenant has recently exercised their statutory rights regarding disrepair or health and safety issues.”
The report includes a survey of 129 environmental health officers and tenancy relations officers. Nearly half said that in their experience, people were put off using their help because they don’t want to put their tenancy in jeopardy.

Issue: 7277 / Categories: Legal News , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll