header-logo header-logo

25 November 2010 / James Davies
Issue: 7443 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Retired by default

Some age-old issues & the demise of the DRA...

James Davies reports on some age-old issues & the demise of the DRA

In its response to the government’s consultation document on phasing out the default retirement age (DRA), the Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) concluded that the proposals to phase out DRA from April 2011, with transitional arrangements until the repeal date of 1 October 2011, give insufficient time to adapt to the end of the DRA and could lead to employers retiring employees early to avoid uncertainty. At a time when the job market is increasingly unstable, the proposals could have serious consequences for “older employees”.

The proposals raise a number of issues. Will employers be able to discuss retirement with their staff? How will the transitional arrangements work? Will retirement be a potentially fair reason for dismissal?

ELA recommends that the repeal of the DRA is put back until at least April 2012 to give the government time address these issues and to develop fully the new retirement regime. The government proposes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll