header-logo header-logo

25 November 2010 / James Davies
Issue: 7443 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Retired by default

Some age-old issues & the demise of the DRA...

James Davies reports on some age-old issues & the demise of the DRA

In its response to the government’s consultation document on phasing out the default retirement age (DRA), the Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) concluded that the proposals to phase out DRA from April 2011, with transitional arrangements until the repeal date of 1 October 2011, give insufficient time to adapt to the end of the DRA and could lead to employers retiring employees early to avoid uncertainty. At a time when the job market is increasingly unstable, the proposals could have serious consequences for “older employees”.

The proposals raise a number of issues. Will employers be able to discuss retirement with their staff? How will the transitional arrangements work? Will retirement be a potentially fair reason for dismissal?

ELA recommends that the repeal of the DRA is put back until at least April 2012 to give the government time address these issues and to develop fully the new retirement regime. The government proposes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll