header-logo header-logo

Retired by default

25 November 2010 / James Davies
Issue: 7443 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Some age-old issues & the demise of the DRA...

James Davies reports on some age-old issues & the demise of the DRA

In its response to the government’s consultation document on phasing out the default retirement age (DRA), the Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) concluded that the proposals to phase out DRA from April 2011, with transitional arrangements until the repeal date of 1 October 2011, give insufficient time to adapt to the end of the DRA and could lead to employers retiring employees early to avoid uncertainty. At a time when the job market is increasingly unstable, the proposals could have serious consequences for “older employees”.

The proposals raise a number of issues. Will employers be able to discuss retirement with their staff? How will the transitional arrangements work? Will retirement be a potentially fair reason for dismissal?

ELA recommends that the repeal of the DRA is put back until at least April 2012 to give the government time address these issues and to develop fully the new retirement regime. The government proposes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll