header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Revisiting misconduct in public office

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
17 March 2021 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Features , Public , Criminal
printer mail-detail
42772
Simon Parsons examines the Law Commission’s analysis of the current law & puts forward the case for reform
  • The history and case law surrounding the criminal offence of misconduct in public office.
  • Breaking down the current elements of the offence, and setting out the case for its reform.

On 4 December 2020, the Law Commission issued its final report into misconduct in public office (Law Com no 397). Its publication had been delayed for some time because of the complexity of the subject matter and funding issues. In the report, the Law Commission recommends the repeal of the current common law offence and its replacement with two more precise and targeted statutory offences. The aim of the report is to strike the correct balance between applying a criminal sanction for the most serious forms of misconduct by public officer holders for the purposes of punishment and deterrence, while leaving space for civil and disciplinary penalties for cases that do not warrant a criminal sanction. The offence was only occasionally prosecuted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Motor finance faces £11bn reckoning
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
NLJ this week: Gold on Awaab’s Law & digital divorce
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
NLJ this week: AI in the dock—courts need literacy, not fear
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Landlords lose their upward climb
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
NLJ this week: Privy Council undresses the ‘shareholder rule’
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll