header-logo header-logo

Rights bullies stifle competition

25 April 2013
Issue: 7557 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Law Commission consults on competition law reform

Competition law could form part of reforms to help protect businesses from “bully boy tactics” by rivals who chase their customers away with groundless patent and trade mark infringement threats.

The current law of groundless threats of infringement stems from the 19th century and was introduced to resolve disputes about steam engines. In a consultation launched this week, the Law Commission argues that reforms are now needed if the law is to cope with global battles over information technology.

The Commission proposes to:
 

  • adapt the 2004 patent law reforms and extend them to trade marks and design rights;
  • clarify at what stage, and under what circumstances, a rights holder can approach a competitor, their distributor or customers, about a potential infringement;
  • protect legal advisers from liability for groundless threats; and
  • treat groundless threats as a form of unfair competition and introduce a new cause of action based on the Paris Convention.

David Hertzell, the Law Commissioner leading the project, said: “When retailers receive letters saying that a product infringes a patent, many just drop the product.

“If the product does infringe, that is fair enough. But where the allegation is groundless, it is important to provide the supplier with a remedy. Otherwise it is too easy for a rival to gain an unfair advantage through bully boy tactics.

“Patents, trade marks and design rights are vital to the UK economy. But they must not be misused to stifle competition.”

The consultation, Patents, Trade Marks and Design Rights: Groundless Threats, closes on 17 July 2013.

Issue: 7557 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll