header-logo header-logo

25 April 2013
Issue: 7557 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Rights bullies stifle competition

Law Commission consults on competition law reform

Competition law could form part of reforms to help protect businesses from “bully boy tactics” by rivals who chase their customers away with groundless patent and trade mark infringement threats.

The current law of groundless threats of infringement stems from the 19th century and was introduced to resolve disputes about steam engines. In a consultation launched this week, the Law Commission argues that reforms are now needed if the law is to cope with global battles over information technology.

The Commission proposes to:
 

  • adapt the 2004 patent law reforms and extend them to trade marks and design rights;
  • clarify at what stage, and under what circumstances, a rights holder can approach a competitor, their distributor or customers, about a potential infringement;
  • protect legal advisers from liability for groundless threats; and
  • treat groundless threats as a form of unfair competition and introduce a new cause of action based on the Paris Convention.

David Hertzell, the Law Commissioner leading the project, said: “When retailers receive letters saying that a product infringes a patent, many just drop the product.

“If the product does infringe, that is fair enough. But where the allegation is groundless, it is important to provide the supplier with a remedy. Otherwise it is too easy for a rival to gain an unfair advantage through bully boy tactics.

“Patents, trade marks and design rights are vital to the UK economy. But they must not be misused to stifle competition.”

The consultation, Patents, Trade Marks and Design Rights: Groundless Threats, closes on 17 July 2013.

Issue: 7557 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll