header-logo header-logo

07 July 2022
Issue: 7986 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Rights ‘regression’

The government ‘has failed to make the case for repealing and replacing the Human Rights Act with a Bill of Rights in the form proposed’, the chair of the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR), Joanna Cherry QC MP has warned

In a letter to the Justice Secretary, Dominic Raab last week, Cherry said the JCHR has held two inquiries on plans to reform the HRA and concluded it is ‘functioning as intended as it enables human rights to be enforced effectively in the UK with little recourse needed to the European Court of Human Rights’.

She said the proposed Bill did not reflect the results of the government’s consultation, its own independent review or Parliament’s committees. She wrote: ‘Our view is that the Bill would lead to an unfortunate regression in rights protection.’

The Justice Committee began its inquiry into the proposed Bill this week.
Issue: 7986 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll