header-logo header-logo

13 September 2007 / Helen Hart , Beverley Flynn
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Features , Media
printer mail-detail

Ringing in changes?

Beverley Flynn and Helen Hart examine the recent premium phone-in competition débâcle

Television programmes which run phone-ins—often using premium rate numbers—for the audience to participate in have come under the spotlight recently. Audience participation can include the opportunity to enter a competition, to vote or donate to a charity.

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

The current regulatory regime for communications in the UK is primarily contained in the Communications Act 2003 (CA 2003) and the Broadcasting Act 1996 (as amended), which implements a series of EU Directives. The sector is regulated by the Office of Communications (Ofcom).
CA 2003, s 319 requires Ofcom to set standards for the content of television/radio programmes. Its objectives must be to:
- protect under 18s;
- apply generally accepted standards to the contents of TV services; and
- provide adequate protection to the public against the inclusion of offensive and harmful material.

These objectives are contained in the Broadcasting Code issued by Ofcom which applies to broadcasters—although special rules apply in certain cases to the BBC.
Failure to comply with the Broadcasting Code

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll