header-logo header-logo

13 September 2007 / Helen Hart , Beverley Flynn
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Features , Media
printer mail-detail

Ringing in changes?

Beverley Flynn and Helen Hart examine the recent premium phone-in competition débâcle

Television programmes which run phone-ins—often using premium rate numbers—for the audience to participate in have come under the spotlight recently. Audience participation can include the opportunity to enter a competition, to vote or donate to a charity.

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

The current regulatory regime for communications in the UK is primarily contained in the Communications Act 2003 (CA 2003) and the Broadcasting Act 1996 (as amended), which implements a series of EU Directives. The sector is regulated by the Office of Communications (Ofcom).
CA 2003, s 319 requires Ofcom to set standards for the content of television/radio programmes. Its objectives must be to:
- protect under 18s;
- apply generally accepted standards to the contents of TV services; and
- provide adequate protection to the public against the inclusion of offensive and harmful material.

These objectives are contained in the Broadcasting Code issued by Ofcom which applies to broadcasters—although special rules apply in certain cases to the BBC.
Failure to comply with the Broadcasting Code

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll