header-logo header-logo

Ripe for reform

11 January 2007 / Stuart Bridge
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

The Law Commission wants to abolish the law of forfeiture for breach of covenant. Stuart Bridge explains why

In January 2004, the Law Commission’s (the commission’s) consultation paper, Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default (Law Com No 174) (see 154 NLJ 7113, p 113), stated that the law of forfeiture was “complex…lacks coherence and…can lead to injustice”. It provisionally proposed that forfeiture should be replaced with a statutory scheme for the termination of tenancies. The scheme would make the law easier to understand, simpler to use, and would assist landlords and tenants to resolve disputes out of court. Responses to the consultation paper revealed widespread dissatisfaction with the current law and strong support for reform.

The commission has now published its final report (Law Com No 303) and the draft Landlord and Tenant (Termination of Tenancies) Bill. This article briefly sets out the main recommendations, which are largely of significance in relation to commercial tenancies and long residential tenancies.
Landlords will no longer be able to terminate a tenancy by using the law of forfeiture

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll