header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
11 January 2007 / Stuart Bridge
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Ripe for reform

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

The Law Commission wants to abolish the law of forfeiture for breach of covenant. Stuart Bridge explains why

In January 2004, the Law Commission’s (the commission’s) consultation paper, Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default (Law Com No 174) (see 154 NLJ 7113, p 113), stated that the law of forfeiture was “complex…lacks coherence and…can lead to injustice”. It provisionally proposed that forfeiture should be replaced with a statutory scheme for the termination of tenancies. The scheme would make the law easier to understand, simpler to use, and would assist landlords and tenants to resolve disputes out of court. Responses to the consultation paper revealed widespread dissatisfaction with the current law and strong support for reform.

The commission has now published its final report (Law Com No 303) and the draft Landlord and Tenant (Termination of Tenancies) Bill. This article briefly sets out the main recommendations, which are largely of significance in relation to commercial tenancies and long residential tenancies.
Landlords will no longer be able to terminate a tenancy by using the law of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Speechlive LogoClick to know more
Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Employment law’s four-point check
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
NLJ this week: Privacy meets the courtroom
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
NLJ this week: Auditors tighten the disclosure screws
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
NLJ this week: Telecoms tenants caught in a legal gap
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
NLJ this week: Due process holds the line

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll