header-logo header-logo

26 February 2009 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Ripping yarn

Family

Destroy NLJ 157, 7296, p 1571 under “One Family; Two Homes”. The House of Lords has messed things up by reversing the Court of Appeal in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7, [2009] All ER (D) 36 (Feb). The relevant housing authority should not intervene on a shared residence application to argue against an order although it would be helpful for the court to know what accommodation, if any, the authority was likely to provide. Only in exceptional circumstances would it be reasonable to expect a child who had a home with one parent to be provided with a home with another under the Housing Act 1996, Pt VII so that he could reside with the other parent as well.

Issue: 7358 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Housing
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gardner Leader—Charlotte Botham & Belinda Sinnott

Gardner Leader—Charlotte Botham & Belinda Sinnott

Law firm strengthens real estate team with two new partners

DR Solicitors—Sarah Cook

DR Solicitors—Sarah Cook

DR Solicitors strengthens primary care expertise with appointment of legal director

Womble Bond Dickinson—David Varney

Womble Bond Dickinson—David Varney

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints David Varney to strengthen digital practice

NEWS
The Court of Appeal's decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP has lifted months of uncertainty for Chartered Legal Executives while prompting a rethink of regulation and supervision
The assisted dying debate returns to Westminster as Lauren Edwards MP reintroduces legislation that stalled in the House of Lords last session despite clearing the Commons
A little-noticed provision of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 has fundamentally expanded corporate criminal liability
Artificial intelligence is transforming legal practice, but careless reliance on it is creating growing professional risks
The law offers cohabiting couples surprisingly greater protection after one partner dies than when they separate during life
back-to-top-scroll