header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 May 2015 / Catherine Leech
Issue: 7650 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The ripple effect

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_may_1_leech

Catherine Leech reflects on the impact of Woodland on liability & arguments for a non-delegable duty of care

The recent judgment of Mr Justice Blake (handed down 13 February 2015) in the case of Woodland v Maxwell and another [2015] EWHC 273 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 162 (Feb) reinforces the importance of this case as a truly landmark case following the decision in 2013 of the Supreme Court in the same matter ([2013] UKSC 66, [2014] 1 All ER 482).

Annie Woodland was with other children from Whitmore Junior School on 5 July 2000 with the advanced group having swimming lessons in the main pool at Gloucester Park, Basildon. She was 10 years old and the other members of her group were a similar age. Annie suffered a cardiac arrest and brain injury caused through lack of oxygen as a result of a near drowning episode which was not spotted quickly by the swimming teacher for her group nor the lifeguard on duty.

The recent trial before Blake J was on the issue

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll