header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 May 2015 / Catherine Leech
Issue: 7650 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The ripple effect

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_may_1_leech

Catherine Leech reflects on the impact of Woodland on liability & arguments for a non-delegable duty of care

The recent judgment of Mr Justice Blake (handed down 13 February 2015) in the case of Woodland v Maxwell and another [2015] EWHC 273 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 162 (Feb) reinforces the importance of this case as a truly landmark case following the decision in 2013 of the Supreme Court in the same matter ([2013] UKSC 66, [2014] 1 All ER 482).

Annie Woodland was with other children from Whitmore Junior School on 5 July 2000 with the advanced group having swimming lessons in the main pool at Gloucester Park, Basildon. She was 10 years old and the other members of her group were a similar age. Annie suffered a cardiac arrest and brain injury caused through lack of oxygen as a result of a near drowning episode which was not spotted quickly by the swimming teacher for her group nor the lifeguard on duty.

The recent trial before Blake J was on the issue

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Read All
‘Lost years’ precedent overturned
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
NLJ this week: Neutral counsel in a polarised age
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
NLJ this week: Justice at the algorithm’s edge
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll