header-logo header-logo

01 May 2015 / Catherine Leech
Issue: 7650 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The ripple effect

nlj_may_1_leech

Catherine Leech reflects on the impact of Woodland on liability & arguments for a non-delegable duty of care

The recent judgment of Mr Justice Blake (handed down 13 February 2015) in the case of Woodland v Maxwell and another [2015] EWHC 273 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 162 (Feb) reinforces the importance of this case as a truly landmark case following the decision in 2013 of the Supreme Court in the same matter ([2013] UKSC 66, [2014] 1 All ER 482).

Annie Woodland was with other children from Whitmore Junior School on 5 July 2000 with the advanced group having swimming lessons in the main pool at Gloucester Park, Basildon. She was 10 years old and the other members of her group were a similar age. Annie suffered a cardiac arrest and brain injury caused through lack of oxygen as a result of a near drowning episode which was not spotted quickly by the swimming teacher for her group nor the lifeguard on duty.

The recent trial before Blake J was on the issue

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll