header-logo header-logo

12 June 2008
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Legal services , Family
printer mail-detail

Rise in care proceedings fees under fire

Legal news update

The huge increases in care proceedings fees paid by local authorities since May 2008 leave vulnerable children at greater risk of harm, lawyers say.

The government pledged to implement the increases proposed in its consultation paper Public Law Family Fees which sees court fees for care proceedings rise from £150 to £4,000.

Resolution chief executive Karen MacKay says that although the government has set aside £40m to help local authorities with the increase, this was not ring-fenced, meaning the welfare of many children might be compromised by financial considerations.

“The worry is that local authorities will run out of money to take non-emergency cases to court. This may mean leaving a child with neglectful parents or encouraging parents to agree to the child being voluntarily accommodated temporarily instead of issuing proceedings,” she says.

She adds that if local authorities consider compromises instead of issuing court proceedings as a way of avoiding increased costs, “vulnerable children will be put at risk and denied access to justice”.

The Law Society says it is fundamentally opposed to the government’s policy of full cost pricing to meet the costs of the civil and family courts, which provide a benefit for all society.

A spokesperson says: “There is currently overrecovery in relation to the civil courts, and this should be fed back into the system. There is also a strong case for public funding to support the work of the family courts in cases concerning the protection and welfare of children.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll