header-logo header-logo

12 June 2008
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Legal services , Family
printer mail-detail

Rise in care proceedings fees under fire

Legal news update

The huge increases in care proceedings fees paid by local authorities since May 2008 leave vulnerable children at greater risk of harm, lawyers say.

The government pledged to implement the increases proposed in its consultation paper Public Law Family Fees which sees court fees for care proceedings rise from £150 to £4,000.

Resolution chief executive Karen MacKay says that although the government has set aside £40m to help local authorities with the increase, this was not ring-fenced, meaning the welfare of many children might be compromised by financial considerations.

“The worry is that local authorities will run out of money to take non-emergency cases to court. This may mean leaving a child with neglectful parents or encouraging parents to agree to the child being voluntarily accommodated temporarily instead of issuing proceedings,” she says.

She adds that if local authorities consider compromises instead of issuing court proceedings as a way of avoiding increased costs, “vulnerable children will be put at risk and denied access to justice”.

The Law Society says it is fundamentally opposed to the government’s policy of full cost pricing to meet the costs of the civil and family courts, which provide a benefit for all society.

A spokesperson says: “There is currently overrecovery in relation to the civil courts, and this should be fed back into the system. There is also a strong case for public funding to support the work of the family courts in cases concerning the protection and welfare of children.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll