header-logo header-logo

Rise in care proceedings fees under fire

12 June 2008
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Legal services , Family
printer mail-detail

Legal news update

The huge increases in care proceedings fees paid by local authorities since May 2008 leave vulnerable children at greater risk of harm, lawyers say.

The government pledged to implement the increases proposed in its consultation paper Public Law Family Fees which sees court fees for care proceedings rise from £150 to £4,000.

Resolution chief executive Karen MacKay says that although the government has set aside £40m to help local authorities with the increase, this was not ring-fenced, meaning the welfare of many children might be compromised by financial considerations.

“The worry is that local authorities will run out of money to take non-emergency cases to court. This may mean leaving a child with neglectful parents or encouraging parents to agree to the child being voluntarily accommodated temporarily instead of issuing proceedings,” she says.

She adds that if local authorities consider compromises instead of issuing court proceedings as a way of avoiding increased costs, “vulnerable children will be put at risk and denied access to justice”.

The Law Society says it is fundamentally opposed to the government’s policy of full cost pricing to meet the costs of the civil and family courts, which provide a benefit for all society.

A spokesperson says: “There is currently overrecovery in relation to the civil courts, and this should be fed back into the system. There is also a strong case for public funding to support the work of the family courts in cases concerning the protection and welfare of children.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll