header-logo header-logo

31 March 2017 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7740 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Rise of the machines (Pt 2)

nlj_7740_dowden

Malcolm Dowden & Kizzie Fenner examine the evidential potential of the Internet of Things & the benefits of smart contracts

  • IoT sensors can plug the evidential gap for goods damaged in transit.
  • Data from IoT sensors can support more flexible contracting, with price dynamically adjusting with conditions.

Around 90% of world trade is carried by sea. International law governing the carriage of goods has evolved over centuries. Today, international treaties, conventions, the common law and national statutes all play a part. While their application and nuances have been explored by courts and tribunals around the world, issues of legal principle, as well as of commercial, practical significance remain unresolved.

A recent decision of the English Court of Appeal suggests that those areas of doubt and controversy are also areas of significant opportunity for “smart contracts” and the “internet of things” (IoT).

Shifting burden of proof

In Volcafe v CSAV [2016] EWCA Civ 1103, [2016] All ER (D) 87 (Nov) the Court of Appeal considered where the burden of proof lies

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll