header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
31 March 2017 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7740 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Rise of the machines (Pt 2)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7740_dowden

Malcolm Dowden & Kizzie Fenner examine the evidential potential of the Internet of Things & the benefits of smart contracts
  • IoT sensors can plug the evidential gap for goods damaged in transit.
  • Data from IoT sensors can support more flexible contracting, with price dynamically adjusting with conditions.

Around 90% of world trade is carried by sea. International law governing the carriage of goods has evolved over centuries. Today, international treaties, conventions, the common law and national statutes all play a part. While their application and nuances have been explored by courts and tribunals around the world, issues of legal principle, as well as of commercial, practical significance remain unresolved.

A recent decision of the English Court of Appeal suggests that those areas of doubt and controversy are also areas of significant opportunity for “smart contracts” and the “internet of things” (IoT).

Shifting burden of proof

In Volcafe v CSAV [2016] EWCA Civ 1103, [2016] All ER (D) 87 (Nov) the Court of Appeal considered where the burden of proof lies

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll