header-logo header-logo

Rising pressure

13 August 2015 / Nichola Evans
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
nlj_7665_evans

Nichola Evans raises questions over the court fee increase consultation

Another day, another consultation from the Ministry of Justice. Hang on—this one seems to be about an increase to court fees: didn’t we have one of those only a few months back?

So we’re about to see a doubling of the fee for issuing a consent application and an increase from £155 to £255 for a contested application. In addition there will be a consultation as to whether there ought to be an increase in the maximum fee for the issue of money claims from £10,000 to £20,000 and a 10% increase in other civil court fees. Also there are proposed increases to fees for possession and divorce proceedings.

Piecemeal review

In other news, we read that the Lord Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls have appointed Lord Justice Briggs to conduct an urgent review of the court system to help “ensure the reform programme designs a service which makes best use of the large capital investment proposed and provides a modern, efficient and accessible

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll