header-logo header-logo

13 August 2015 / Nichola Evans
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Rising pressure

nlj_7665_evans

Nichola Evans raises questions over the court fee increase consultation

Another day, another consultation from the Ministry of Justice. Hang on—this one seems to be about an increase to court fees: didn’t we have one of those only a few months back?

So we’re about to see a doubling of the fee for issuing a consent application and an increase from £155 to £255 for a contested application. In addition there will be a consultation as to whether there ought to be an increase in the maximum fee for the issue of money claims from £10,000 to £20,000 and a 10% increase in other civil court fees. Also there are proposed increases to fees for possession and divorce proceedings.

Piecemeal review

In other news, we read that the Lord Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls have appointed Lord Justice Briggs to conduct an urgent review of the court system to help “ensure the reform programme designs a service which makes best use of the large capital investment proposed and provides a modern, efficient and accessible

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll