header-logo header-logo

13 August 2015 / Nichola Evans
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Rising pressure

nlj_7665_evans

Nichola Evans raises questions over the court fee increase consultation

Another day, another consultation from the Ministry of Justice. Hang on—this one seems to be about an increase to court fees: didn’t we have one of those only a few months back?

So we’re about to see a doubling of the fee for issuing a consent application and an increase from £155 to £255 for a contested application. In addition there will be a consultation as to whether there ought to be an increase in the maximum fee for the issue of money claims from £10,000 to £20,000 and a 10% increase in other civil court fees. Also there are proposed increases to fees for possession and divorce proceedings.

Piecemeal review

In other news, we read that the Lord Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls have appointed Lord Justice Briggs to conduct an urgent review of the court system to help “ensure the reform programme designs a service which makes best use of the large capital investment proposed and provides a modern, efficient and accessible

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll