header-logo header-logo

27 May 2016
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The road to redress for motor accident victims

Motor accident victims could pursue a radical route to redress, according to a motor insurance specialist lawyer.

Writing in NLJ this week, Nicholas Bevan argues the case for claiming compensation from the Motor Insurance Bureau on the basis that the European Directive that defines its role is capable of having direct effect against it.

In 2014, in Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Triglav C-162/13, the ECJ confirmed that compulsory third party motor insurance is supposed to apply to use on private property and to embrace any mechanically propelled vehicles intended for travel on land. The UK’s implementation of this law, however, excludes private property and numerous off-road vehicles. Therefore, Bevan argues, victims of these types of accidents are unlawfully denied the compensatory protection extended to other motor accident victims.

Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll