header-logo header-logo

24 March 2011 / Donald Cran
Issue: 7458 / Categories: LexisPSL , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Rollback of state surveillance

Donald Cran investigates the Protection of Freedoms Bill

The Protection of Freedoms Bill has been laid before Parliament. Its aim is to reverse unwarranted state intrusion on private lives and what the Government saw as a gradual erosion of civil freedoms under the previous administration.

Often called the Great Repeal Bill, the measure is seen by some as the most important reform in civil liberties since the Bill of Rights 1689. Its major provisions are:
 

  1. Reduction in vetting and barring for volunteers who work with children and vulnerable adults. In future only those in particularly sensitive positions, or who come into regular and intensive contact with children, will require clearance and monitoring. More than half of the nine million people who have needed checks in the past will no longer do so; in addition, the system of vetting is to be reviewed.
  2. Restriction on local authorities’ powers to use RIPA. The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 may now only be used to investigate serious crime (which could attract a custodial sentence of
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll