header-logo header-logo

Rollback of state surveillance

24 March 2011 / Donald Cran
Issue: 7458 / Categories: LexisPSL , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Donald Cran investigates the Protection of Freedoms Bill

The Protection of Freedoms Bill has been laid before Parliament. Its aim is to reverse unwarranted state intrusion on private lives and what the Government saw as a gradual erosion of civil freedoms under the previous administration.

Often called the Great Repeal Bill, the measure is seen by some as the most important reform in civil liberties since the Bill of Rights 1689. Its major provisions are:
 

  1. Reduction in vetting and barring for volunteers who work with children and vulnerable adults. In future only those in particularly sensitive positions, or who come into regular and intensive contact with children, will require clearance and monitoring. More than half of the nine million people who have needed checks in the past will no longer do so; in addition, the system of vetting is to be reviewed.
  2. Restriction on local authorities’ powers to use RIPA. The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 may now only be used to investigate serious crime (which could attract a custodial sentence of six
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll