header-logo header-logo

24 March 2011 / Donald Cran
Issue: 7458 / Categories: LexisPSL , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Rollback of state surveillance

Donald Cran investigates the Protection of Freedoms Bill

The Protection of Freedoms Bill has been laid before Parliament. Its aim is to reverse unwarranted state intrusion on private lives and what the Government saw as a gradual erosion of civil freedoms under the previous administration.

Often called the Great Repeal Bill, the measure is seen by some as the most important reform in civil liberties since the Bill of Rights 1689. Its major provisions are:
 

  1. Reduction in vetting and barring for volunteers who work with children and vulnerable adults. In future only those in particularly sensitive positions, or who come into regular and intensive contact with children, will require clearance and monitoring. More than half of the nine million people who have needed checks in the past will no longer do so; in addition, the system of vetting is to be reviewed.
  2. Restriction on local authorities’ powers to use RIPA. The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 may now only be used to investigate serious crime (which could attract a custodial sentence of
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll