header-logo header-logo

07 September 2012 / Karl Tonks
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Room for improvement

Plans to help sick & dying workers must go further, says Karl Tonks

Plans for a fund of last resort to compensate workers with asbestos-related lung cancer mesothelioma are a significant step in the right direction.

But while the fund will provide much needed redress to many sick and dying workers, the proposals still fall short of ensuring that all innocent victims of industrial disease are compensated properly.

The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL)  has campaigned for more than a decade for the introduction of a workplace fund of last resort, also known as an employers’ liability insurance bureau.

Such a fund is needed because the onset of symptoms for long-tail diseases, such as mesothelioma, can occur decades after a worker has inhaled asbestos fibres. Because of the historic nature of these claims, it can be impossible for a victim to trace his employer, and his employer’s insurer, to bring a claim.

Consistently argued

APIL has consistently argued that insurers should not be allowed to dodge their responsibility of paying compensation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll