header-logo header-logo

07 September 2012 / Karl Tonks
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Room for improvement

Plans to help sick & dying workers must go further, says Karl Tonks

Plans for a fund of last resort to compensate workers with asbestos-related lung cancer mesothelioma are a significant step in the right direction.

But while the fund will provide much needed redress to many sick and dying workers, the proposals still fall short of ensuring that all innocent victims of industrial disease are compensated properly.

The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL)  has campaigned for more than a decade for the introduction of a workplace fund of last resort, also known as an employers’ liability insurance bureau.

Such a fund is needed because the onset of symptoms for long-tail diseases, such as mesothelioma, can occur decades after a worker has inhaled asbestos fibres. Because of the historic nature of these claims, it can be impossible for a victim to trace his employer, and his employer’s insurer, to bring a claim.

Consistently argued

APIL has consistently argued that insurers should not be allowed to dodge their responsibility of paying compensation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll