header-logo header-logo

19 February 2010 / Benjamin Faulkner
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A room with a view

Benjamin Faulkner examines whether a landowner has the right to a view

It is well known that the law does not ordinarily provide a landowner with a right to a view. In general, his neighbour is free to undertake building or extension works as he likes. In some cases the proposed works might be blocked by the planning authorities, or a management company might exercise rights to control development within a residential estate, but there is no guarantee of either eventuality.

The landowner might have a right to light which could be infringed by the proposed works, but often the development will be too far away from the landowner’s building to diminish the amount of light reaching it significantly, notwithstanding the obstruction of his panorama. In Dennis v Davies [2009] EWCA Civ 1081 the Court of Appeal confirmed that there will often be a third way: protections offered to the landowner by a restrictive covenant not to create a “nuisance or annoyance”.

The facts

Dennis v Davies concerned a residential development on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll