header-logo header-logo

Rosamond McDowell Collyer Bristow

15 December 2011
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Rosamond McDowell has replaced Andrew Dixon as head of Collyer Bristow’s market tax and estate planning practice.

She has been a partner at the firm since 2007 since qualifying in 1998. Rosamond moved to the firm in 2004, having previously worked at Pinsents. Her practice focuses on contentious trusts and probate, wealth management, estate planning and tax structuring advice to families and high net worth individuals and corporate trustees and charities, both in the UK and worldwide.

Issue: 7494 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll