header-logo header-logo

12 September 2023
Issue: 8040 / Categories: Legal News , Rule of law , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Rule of law has been ‘undermined’

JUSTICE report identifies slate of government attacks on the rule of law

The rule of law has ‘regressed significantly on multiple fronts’ in the UK, according to a devastating report by law and rights charity JUSTICE.

‘There are multiple reasons why we have reached the parlous state we are in,’ Fiona Rutherford, chief executive of JUSTICE, said.

‘Each one viewed in isolation does not amount to the wholesale negation of the rule of law—but taken together they create a picture suggesting that the rule of law is being incrementally undermined. We believe we have reached a tipping point and are determined to highlight a route back.’

JUSTICE’s 105-page report, ‘The state we’re in: addressing threats & challenges to the rule of law’, published this week, called on the government to stop using ‘inflammatory language’ such as referring to ‘unelected judiciary’.

The report found the process of lawmaking has become less transparent, less accountable, less inclusive and less democratic in the past decade, particularly in the past five years.

Public consultations, for example, were often poorly conducted, if at all. The report gives the examples of the Illegal Migration Act 2023, for which there was no public consultation or pre-legislative scrutiny, and the Bill of Rights Bill consultation, which was sidelined despite 90% of the 12,000 responses received opposing the reforms.

The report found a growing legislative disregard for human rights, for example, it noted the chilling effect of the Public Order Act 2023 on our rights to freedom of thought, expression and peaceful assembly. The government was increasingly using ‘Henry VIII’ powers to allow ministers to avoid or minimise legislative scrutiny by changing laws via statutory instrument. Meanwhile, individuals seeking to enforce or defend their rights were hampered by legal aid cuts and lengthy case backlogs.

JUSTICE called on the government to make ‘skeleton legislation’ an exception not a convenience, reduce its use of ‘Henry VIII’ powers, and make equality impact assessments a mandatory part of the legislative process.

It recommended wholesale repeal of several pieces of legislation passed since 2019, including Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Act 2021, the Public Order Act 2023 and the Illegal Migration Act 2023.
Issue: 8040 / Categories: Legal News , Rule of law , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll