header-logo header-logo

Rules of disclosure

19 February 2010 / David Lock
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

David Lock examines the effect on confidentiality in care proceedings following the judgment in Ward

The number of child protection proceedings has risen sharply in the light of the Baby Peter case. At the same time there have been increased calls for greater transparency in family proceedings and demands from parents and others to be allowed to speak about events behind the closed doors of the family courts. However both the rules and the general understanding of the rules by the medical and legal professions has to date made it very difficult for those caught up in family proceedings to explain what has gone on behind closed doors.

However there is a wind of change in the air. In Ward [2010] EWCH 16 (Fam), which was one of his last judgments before assuming his role as chairman of the Law Commission, Lord Justice Munby has rewritten the rules around the confidentiality of family proceedings and used the European Convention on Human Rights to open the way for much greater disclosure of the inner workings of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll