header-logo header-logo

Rules of disclosure

19 February 2010 / David Lock
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

David Lock examines the effect on confidentiality in care proceedings following the judgment in Ward

The number of child protection proceedings has risen sharply in the light of the Baby Peter case. At the same time there have been increased calls for greater transparency in family proceedings and demands from parents and others to be allowed to speak about events behind the closed doors of the family courts. However both the rules and the general understanding of the rules by the medical and legal professions has to date made it very difficult for those caught up in family proceedings to explain what has gone on behind closed doors.

However there is a wind of change in the air. In Ward [2010] EWCH 16 (Fam), which was one of his last judgments before assuming his role as chairman of the Law Commission, Lord Justice Munby has rewritten the rules around the confidentiality of family proceedings and used the European Convention on Human Rights to open the way for much greater disclosure of the inner workings of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll