header-logo header-logo

15 May 2026 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 8161 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Rules of engagement

249524
© Getty images

Mark Pawlowski asks the unromantic question of who keeps the ring, and when, if a couple split

Prior to the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970, a gift of an engagement ring was construed as conditional on the parties’ marriage taking place. In Jacobs v Davis [1917] 2 KB 532, for example, an action was brought to recover a diamond ring given by the plaintiff to the defendant on their engagement. Subsequently, the engagement was broken off. Mr Justice Shearman held that when an engagement ring was given by a man to a woman, there was an implied condition that the ring should be returned if the engagement was broken off. The judge stated, at p533:

‘Though the origin of the engagement ring has been forgotten, it still retains its character of a pledge or something to bind the bargain or contract to marry, and it is given on the understanding that a party who breaks the contract must return it. Whether the ring is a pledge or a conditional gift, the result

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll