header-logo header-logo

Ruling arbitration

24 June 2016 / Olivia Staines
Issue: 7704 / Categories: Features , Profession , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail
nlj_7704_ciarb3

Olivia Staines discusses the main features of CIArb’s new Arbitration Rules

The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators’ (CIArb) new Arbitration Rules, which came into effect on 1 December 2015, are very different from most other institutional rules. Hailed as the bearers of an “administration lite” service, they comprise input from the Institute’s 37 branches as well as 60 members of its international teaching faculty.

Why did CIArb decide to produce a new set of Arbitration Rules?

CIArb’s previous set of Rules were last revised in 2000 and crucially, they only applied to domestic arbitrations under the English Arbitration Act 1996. In order to resonate with the words in our Royal Charter and Bye-laws, which state that we are here to “promote and facilitate worldwide the determination of disputes by arbitration”, we decided to produce a new set of Rules in 2015 which could be applied internationally and cater to the ever-changing arbitration landscape.

Who drafted the new Rules?

A special sub-committee was gathered to produce the first draft of the new Rules. After review and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Partner appointed to head international insolvency and dispute resolution for England

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Kent firm expands regional footprint through strategic acquisition

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Financial disputes and investigations specialist joins as partner in London

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
back-to-top-scroll