header-logo header-logo

10 May 2007 / Richard Miller
Issue: 7272 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

The rush to reform

The government needs to slow down and re-engage with the profession if it wants to satisfy consumers, says Richard Miller

With unexpectedly strong language—“breathtakingly risky”; “short-sighted transitional arrangements”; “catastrophic deterioration in the relationship between suppliers, their representative organisations, and the Legal Services Commission (LSC)”—the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee (CASC), in its report Implementation of the Carter Review of Legal Aid, called on the government last week to abandon plans to introduce fixed and graduated fees in October 2007, to review its long-term proposals for best value tendering and to pilot any reforms it decides to bring in.

October 2007 is due to see the introduction of fixed fees for social welfare law advice and assistance, and “graduated” fees, which are merely a series of fixed fees, for family and immigration work. New proposals have been introduced for police station contracts. A graduated fee scheme for solicitors for crown court work is expected, but formal consultation on the scheme has still not started. We are also still awaiting details of the new mental health fee

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll