header-logo header-logo

10 May 2007 / Richard Miller
Issue: 7272 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

The rush to reform

The government needs to slow down and re-engage with the profession if it wants to satisfy consumers, says Richard Miller

With unexpectedly strong language—“breathtakingly risky”; “short-sighted transitional arrangements”; “catastrophic deterioration in the relationship between suppliers, their representative organisations, and the Legal Services Commission (LSC)”—the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee (CASC), in its report Implementation of the Carter Review of Legal Aid, called on the government last week to abandon plans to introduce fixed and graduated fees in October 2007, to review its long-term proposals for best value tendering and to pilot any reforms it decides to bring in.

October 2007 is due to see the introduction of fixed fees for social welfare law advice and assistance, and “graduated” fees, which are merely a series of fixed fees, for family and immigration work. New proposals have been introduced for police station contracts. A graduated fee scheme for solicitors for crown court work is expected, but formal consultation on the scheme has still not started. We are also still awaiting details of the new mental health fee

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll