header-logo header-logo

10 May 2007 / Richard Miller
Issue: 7272 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

The rush to reform

The government needs to slow down and re-engage with the profession if it wants to satisfy consumers, says Richard Miller

With unexpectedly strong language—“breathtakingly risky”; “short-sighted transitional arrangements”; “catastrophic deterioration in the relationship between suppliers, their representative organisations, and the Legal Services Commission (LSC)”—the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee (CASC), in its report Implementation of the Carter Review of Legal Aid, called on the government last week to abandon plans to introduce fixed and graduated fees in October 2007, to review its long-term proposals for best value tendering and to pilot any reforms it decides to bring in.

October 2007 is due to see the introduction of fixed fees for social welfare law advice and assistance, and “graduated” fees, which are merely a series of fixed fees, for family and immigration work. New proposals have been introduced for police station contracts. A graduated fee scheme for solicitors for crown court work is expected, but formal consultation on the scheme has still not started. We are also still awaiting details of the new mental health fee

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll