header-logo header-logo

Rwanda & constitutional law

Long after it is repealed, the Safety of Rwanda Act will illustrate the fragility & vulnerability of fundamental constitutional principles, writes Graham Zellick KC

We read frequently of the concern of presidents and prime ministers, especially as their political lives are drawing to a close, over their legacy, the enduring contributions for which they will be remembered by posterity. I shall leave it for the political commentators and constitutional historians to reflect on Rishi Sunak’s legacy, but I confidently predict that his name will forever be associated with the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Act 2024, even long after it has been repealed (and, with a general election scheduled for 4 July, it is highly likely to be repealed by an incoming Labour government before the first flight has taken off).

This is not because of his efforts—heroic or desperate, depending on your point of view—to see his policy of removing illegal migrants and asylum seekers to Rwanda (to ‘stop the boats’, in his

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll