header-logo header-logo

Rwanda removals: grounded (for now)?

22 July 2022 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7988 / Categories: Features , Public , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail
88166
The intervention of the European Court of Human Rights in the government’s Rwanda asylum plan was a rare success, as Neil Parpworth explains
  • The legal basis for the decision of the European Court of Human Rights to prevent the UK government’s removal of asylum seekers to Rwanda under the interim measures mechanism contained within rule 39 of its rules of court.

Unsurprisingly, the UK government’s Rwanda asylum plan which was announced in April has attracted considerable media attention, and has resulted in legal challenges before the courts. At the time of writing, a judicial review of the plan is to be heard sometime in July. Prior to this, however, lawyers acting on behalf of those affected sought interim relief to stay their removal on a charter flight to Rwanda pending the hearing of the substantive claim. At first instance, Swift J refused to grant the relief sought. An appeal against his decision was dismissed by the Court of Appeal, and a panel of three Justices of the Supreme Court (Lords

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll