header-logo header-logo

Saatchi's Medical Innovation Bill may impact on patient safety

27 October 2014
Issue: 7628 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Personal injury lawyers have warned Lord Saatchi’s Medical Innovation Bill could drive vulnerable patients into the hands of “maverick” doctors.

Lord Saatchi’s bill would give legal protection to doctors seeking to try alternative procedures or treatments for cancer. It goes to committee stage in the House of Lords next week.

However, John Spencer, president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (Apil) said that, contrary to popular perception, the Bill would not just apply to “dying people who are willing to give anything a chance". 

“In fact, the Bill will affect all patients who, in their vulnerability, may be tempted to take risks at the hands of maverick doctors who are over-ambitious in their drive to make names for themselves. Lord Saatchi’s amendments to the Bill do not address concerns about patient safety raised by doctors, patient groups, and medical research organisations. 

“Under the Bill, a doctor needs to only ‘obtain the views’ of an ‘appropriately qualified doctor’ before undertaking an innovative treatment.

"Crucially, he would not have to act on those views, and we still don’t know what an ‘appropriately qualified doctor’ is.”

Spencer said he had heard of no cases of a doctor being sued for using an innovative treatment, and that if some doctors were holding back from certain treatments due to a misunderstanding of the law then that could be could by “an effort to educate, not legislate”.

 

Issue: 7628 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll