header-logo header-logo

To sack or not to sack?

13 May 2010
Issue: 7417 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

David Burrows considers when lawyers can (& should) terminate retainers

Buxton v Mills-Owens [2010] EWCA Civ 122, [2010] All ER (D) 242 (Feb) deals with the issue of whether, and if so in what circumstances, a solicitor may terminate a client’s retainer. In giving judgment, Dyson LJ (as he then was) considers a number of important professional practice questions.

Mr Mills-Owens (MO) instructed Richard Buxton, solicitors (RB), in connection with a planning appeal. The notice of appeal was drafted hastily for reasons explained in the judgment. It contained four grounds. On further consideration, and by a second barrister instructed, RB advised that only the first ground of appeal had any prospect of success “within the very tight parameters set by the law” (para [13]) in this area of work. It would be “counter productive to raise questions ‘which are not going to succeed’” said the barrister (para [14]). MO instructed the lawyers to proceed on all grounds, and and on counsel’s skeleton argument as amended by him.

RB discussed the matter with the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll