header-logo header-logo

To sack or not to sack?

13 May 2010
Issue: 7417 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

David Burrows considers when lawyers can (& should) terminate retainers

Buxton v Mills-Owens [2010] EWCA Civ 122, [2010] All ER (D) 242 (Feb) deals with the issue of whether, and if so in what circumstances, a solicitor may terminate a client’s retainer. In giving judgment, Dyson LJ (as he then was) considers a number of important professional practice questions.

Mr Mills-Owens (MO) instructed Richard Buxton, solicitors (RB), in connection with a planning appeal. The notice of appeal was drafted hastily for reasons explained in the judgment. It contained four grounds. On further consideration, and by a second barrister instructed, RB advised that only the first ground of appeal had any prospect of success “within the very tight parameters set by the law” (para [13]) in this area of work. It would be “counter productive to raise questions ‘which are not going to succeed’” said the barrister (para [14]). MO instructed the lawyers to proceed on all grounds, and and on counsel’s skeleton argument as amended by him.

RB discussed the matter with the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll