header-logo header-logo

Safe house?

04 August 2011 / Malcolm Dowden , Joanna Bhatia
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

How can a tenant’s guarantor guarantee an assignee’s liability, ask Joanna Bhatia & Malcolm Dowden

In Good Harvest Partnership v Centaur Services [2010] EWHC 330 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 238 (Mar), the High Court confirmed that any guarantee by a tenant’s guarantor guaranteeing the tenant’s assignee is void. It falls foul of the anti-avoidance provisions in the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995, s 25 (LT(C)A 1995). The Court of Appeal, in K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser (Stores Management) [2011] EWCA Civ 904, [2011] All ER (D) 262 (Jul) has supported the decision in Good Harvest, save in one respect, which offers a lifeline to landlords.

Good Harvest was controversial in light of the judge’s ruling that any guarantee actually given pursuant to an agreement to give one is void and not just the agreement itself. It overturned a significant strand of commentary on the anti-avoidance provisions, which distinguished between executory agreements (ie agreements that remained to be performed) and executed agreements. Counsel for the landlord in Good Harvest argued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll