header-logo header-logo

Safe as houses?

14 August 2013 / Graham Chase
Issue: 7573 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR
printer mail-detail
istock_000014107752medium

Graham Chase considers the use of ADR to resolve landlord & tenant disputes

The most acrimonious disputes between landlords and tenants usually coincide with, eg rent reviews, changes in use and occupation, and the calculation of the service charge. These are all events which can place a considerable strain on the relationship, however, the parties are bound to each other until the end of the term or a pre-determined break provision can be operated.

The evolution of ADR

ADR has evolved over many years to take away some of the strain of the landlord and tenant relationship under these difficult circumstances. It keeps the affairs private and provides for settlement in full knowledge the relationship will continue after the fracas has become a distant memory.

In the current market the number of disputes settled by ADR appears to have fallen as parties work harder to reach a settlement in this harsh economic environment with little room for error or manoeuvre. Landlords and tenants are conscious of the time lost, costs and distraction

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll