header-logo header-logo

14 August 2013 / Graham Chase
Issue: 7573 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR
printer mail-detail

Safe as houses?

istock_000014107752medium

Graham Chase considers the use of ADR to resolve landlord & tenant disputes

The most acrimonious disputes between landlords and tenants usually coincide with, eg rent reviews, changes in use and occupation, and the calculation of the service charge. These are all events which can place a considerable strain on the relationship, however, the parties are bound to each other until the end of the term or a pre-determined break provision can be operated.

The evolution of ADR

ADR has evolved over many years to take away some of the strain of the landlord and tenant relationship under these difficult circumstances. It keeps the affairs private and provides for settlement in full knowledge the relationship will continue after the fracas has become a distant memory.

In the current market the number of disputes settled by ADR appears to have fallen as parties work harder to reach a settlement in this harsh economic environment with little room for error or manoeuvre. Landlords and tenants are conscious of the time lost, costs and distraction

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll