header-logo header-logo

A brace of Nightingales as cases rise

22 October 2020
Issue: 7907 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-detail
A further two Nightingale courts have opened at Bristol Law Society’s headquarters and Chester Town Hall, bringing the total number to 14.

As of this week, jury trials are being heard in 77 Crown Courts across England and Wales, in addition to five Nightingales and two other courts. However, James Mulholland QC, chair of the Criminal Bar Association, said the backlog of Crown court cases―48,713 on 20 September―was rising each week.

The two new ‘Nightingale Courts’ in Bristol and Chester began hearing cases this week boosting the number of pop-up courts introduced to alleviate pressure on courts and tribunals to 14.

Justice Minister Chris Philp said: ‘These additional facilities will help to boost the capacity of these courts – reducing delays and ensuring speedier justice for all. This is the latest step in our plan to work with the judiciary and legal sector in pursuing every available option to ensure our courts recover as quickly as possible.’

Commenting on the announcement, David Greene, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, said: ‘We are naturally pleased to hear that two more Nightingale Courts have opened, however, thus far only five of the 14 sites opened since July as part of the government’s court recovery plan are running jury trials.

[A]s lockdown tightens once again across the country in response to the pandemic, the need for additional court capacity to enable jury trials to take place safely is ever-increasing. Justice is being delayed for victims, witnesses and defendants, who have proceedings hanging over them for months, if not years, with some trials now being listed for 2022.

Of course, we appreciate the difficulties thrown up by the circumstances but we urge the Ministry of Justice and HMCTS to ensure that it is making maximum use of normal court hours and the existing court estate, quickly take up further building space and avoid any restrictions on judges sitting while there are court rooms (real, virtual or Nightingale) available.

‘ Investing in legal aid for early advice and legal representation would help resolve cases where the defendant pleads, or where charges are dropped, and ensure judicial time is used as efficiently as possible in cases which do go to trial.

 

 

 

Issue: 7907 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll