header-logo header-logo

19 November 2009 / Claire Sanders
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Safety net

Claire Sanders looks at special guardianship orders four years on

It is almost four years (December 2005) since the courts have been able to make special guardianship orders (SGOs) under the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989), s 14A as amended by the Adoption and Children Act 2002; how effective has this provision been in bridging the status between a residence order; long term fostering and adoption?

The White paper, Adoption: A New Approach summarised the main features of the special guardianship regime as being to: give the carer clear responsibility for all aspects of caring for the child, and for making the decisions to do with their upbringing; provide a firm foundation on which to build a lifelong permanent relationship between the carer and the child; be legally secure; preserve the legal link between the child and their birth family; and allow proper access to a full range of support services including, where appropriate, financial.

It also identified a range of circumstances in which adoption may not be the best solution for a child who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll