header-logo header-logo

Safety net

19 November 2009 / Claire Sanders
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Claire Sanders looks at special guardianship orders four years on

It is almost four years (December 2005) since the courts have been able to make special guardianship orders (SGOs) under the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989), s 14A as amended by the Adoption and Children Act 2002; how effective has this provision been in bridging the status between a residence order; long term fostering and adoption?

The White paper, Adoption: A New Approach summarised the main features of the special guardianship regime as being to: give the carer clear responsibility for all aspects of caring for the child, and for making the decisions to do with their upbringing; provide a firm foundation on which to build a lifelong permanent relationship between the carer and the child; be legally secure; preserve the legal link between the child and their birth family; and allow proper access to a full range of support services including, where appropriate, financial.

It also identified a range of circumstances in which adoption may not be the best solution for a child who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll