header-logo header-logo

The saga continues

25 September 2015 / Sally Nesbitt
Issue: 7669 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7669_nesbitt

Sally Nesbitt reports on holiday & sickness absence

Sickness absence and annual leave; five words to bring a shudder to employers and employment lawyers alike, jaded by years of European cases on the subject. But there may be a glimmer of hope. Building on previous European case law, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Plumb v Duncan Print Group Ltd (2015) UKEAT/0071/15, [2015] IRLR 711 clarifies both the circumstances and extent to which an employee is entitled to claim annual leave when off sick.

Carrying over holiday for sick workers

It is common knowledge that a worker is entitled to paid annual leave of at least four weeks under the Working Time Directive (2003/88/EC) (Directive). Regulation 13(9) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (which implement the Directive) provides that holiday must be taken in the leave year in which it is due. It cannot be carried over, or replaced by a payment in lieu, except on termination.

“ May we sigh with relief & put this stream of case law to bed?”

Mr Plumb

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll