header-logo header-logo

25 September 2015 / Sally Nesbitt
Issue: 7669 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

The saga continues

nlj_7669_nesbitt

Sally Nesbitt reports on holiday & sickness absence

Sickness absence and annual leave; five words to bring a shudder to employers and employment lawyers alike, jaded by years of European cases on the subject. But there may be a glimmer of hope. Building on previous European case law, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Plumb v Duncan Print Group Ltd (2015) UKEAT/0071/15, [2015] IRLR 711 clarifies both the circumstances and extent to which an employee is entitled to claim annual leave when off sick.

Carrying over holiday for sick workers

It is common knowledge that a worker is entitled to paid annual leave of at least four weeks under the Working Time Directive (2003/88/EC) (Directive). Regulation 13(9) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (which implement the Directive) provides that holiday must be taken in the leave year in which it is due. It cannot be carried over, or replaced by a payment in lieu, except on termination.

“ May we sigh with relief & put this stream of case law to bed?”

Mr Plumb

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll